glossary
What Is ESG? Environmental, Social, and Governance Explained
Governance GlossaryPublished: August 1, 2023 Last Reviewed: March 16, 2026
Key Takeaways
- ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance — three non-financial factors for evaluating organisations.
- ESG applies to all organisation types: public companies, private firms, and not-for-profits.
- For NFPs, ESG aligns with mission delivery, donor trust, and responsible stewardship of resources.
- Boards should oversee ESG through policies, goals, reporting, and dedicated committee oversight.
- The term originated in a 2004 UN Global Compact report and has since become a mainstream governance framework.
ESG stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance — three categories of non-financial factors used to evaluate how responsibly an organisation operates. While ESG originated with publicly traded firms, its principles now apply equally to private companies and not-for-profits.
The three factors cover:
Environmental - How the organisation affects the natural environment through impacts like resource usage, emissions, waste, conservation, and stewardship.
Social - How the organisation manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, communities, and society through its labor, human rights, consumer, and community impact.
Governance - How the organisation abides by ethics, accountability, transparency, regulations, risk management, controls, and leadership structure.
Specific ESG priorities differ across industries, regions, and business models, but the common thread is assessing and disclosing how sustainably and responsibly an organisation operates.
ESG in Public Companies
For public companies, ESG performance matters because it affects risk exposure, access to capital, and long-term shareholder value. Investors increasingly screen for ESG factors when making allocation decisions.
ESG in Private Companies
Private companies have less external pressure but can still gain substantially from strong ESG management even without public disclosures. The same logic applies in terms of reducing risks, controlling costs, attracting talent, improving processes, and planning for the future. For example, minimising environmental impacts lowers energy and waste expenses. Ethical business practices reduce litigation risks. Diverse and inclusive hiring improves retention. Strict quality control and cybersecurity controls prevent costly problems.
ESG in Family-Owned Enterprises
For family-owned enterprises, ESG helps sustain multi-generational success. For private equity portfolio companies, ESG improves prospects for eventual exit. While private firms may not publish comprehensive reports, tracking ESG performance enables strategic management. Those considering eventual IPOs can prepare ESG programs well in advance.
ESG in Not-for-Profits
For not-for-profits, ESG overlaps with what many organisations already do as part of their mission. The difference is treating these areas systematically rather than ad hoc. A structured ESG approach can help not-for-profits:
- Minimise overhead costs through environmental efficiencies
- Embody fair labor practices that reflect their values
- Maintain reputations via sound ethics and good governance
- Attract passionate talent committed to their causes
- Build trust and loyalty among individual and institutional donors
- Collaborate with corporate partners on societal impact
While not-for-profits may not have shareholders, they do have stakeholders such as employees, volunteers, donors, partners, and communities. ESG programs demonstrate good stewardship of resources and effective pursuit of social missions.
Across all organisational types, board oversight of ESG is important for executing sustainable long-term strategies. Boards can enact ESG-related policies, set goals, tie executive compensation to ESG targets, appoint directors with expertise in ESG-related risks and opportunities, and ensure ethical compliance.
Even without mandated public disclosures, boards should prioritise ESG factors given their linkages to societal wellbeing, operational resilience, reputation, and organisational durability.
To implement a robust ESG program, boards should:
-
Assess the organisation’s complete environmental footprint across all facilities, transportation, supply chains, and product lifecycles. Monitor impact reduction goals related to energy, water, waste, materials, biodiversity, and pollution.
-
Evaluate employee relations, diversity, equity, inclusion, compensation, benefits, training, health, safety, and wellness. Guarantee ethical workplace cultures, human rights protections, and engagement initiatives.
-
Institute and amplify ethics policies on issues like conflicts of interest, anti-corruption, privacy, accountability, whistleblowing, political lobbying, and risk management.
-
Ensure quality control, data security, transparency, fiscal discipline, and compliance with all legal and regulatory obligations.
-
Incentivise executives to prioritise ESG objectives via performance metrics and compensation structures. Appoint board members with multidisciplinary expertise in ESG-related risks and opportunities.
-
Discuss ESG as a regular board meeting agenda item. Create a dedicated committee to oversee ESG programs and performance. Provide ESG training and continuing education for all directors.
ESG Reporting Frameworks
Boards that want to move beyond informal ESG tracking can adopt a recognised reporting framework. The most widely referenced are the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), which provides detailed standards across environmental, social, and governance topics, and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) standards, which focus on financially material sustainability information. In Australia, the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) finalised its sustainability reporting standards (AASB S1 and AASB S2) in 2024, broadly aligned with the ISSB’s IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. Mandatory climate-related disclosure under AASB S2 applies to listed and large unlisted entities on a phased basis from 2025, while broader sustainability reporting under AASB S1 remains voluntary.
Not-for-profit boards are not typically subject to mandatory ESG reporting, but using a framework — even in a simplified form — can help structure board discussions, set measurable targets, and demonstrate accountability to donors, members, and funding bodies. A not-for-profit might, for example, report annually on its energy use, staff diversity, volunteer safety record, and governance practices without producing a full sustainability report. The discipline of tracking and disclosing this information can surface risks early and support grant applications that increasingly ask for evidence of responsible management.
ESG programs do require time and resources to set up, but the payoff is practical: better risk visibility, stronger governance processes, and a clearer picture of how the organisation affects — and is affected by — its environment and community.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does ESG mean in Australia?
In Australia, ESG covers how organisations manage and disclose their environmental stewardship, social impacts, and governance practices. The core concepts are the same globally, but Australian ESG discussions tend to focus on issues like climate risk (particularly for resource-dependent industries), workplace health and safety obligations, modern slavery reporting, and the AASB's new mandatory climate disclosure standards (AASB S2) taking effect from 2025.
ESG originated with socially responsible investment but is now used widely across Australian investors, companies, regulators, and advisors as a framework for assessing corporate sustainability and long-term value.
Where did the term ESG come from?
The term ESG traces back to a 2004 report called 'Who Cares Wins', produced by a group of financial institutions at the invitation of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and facilitated by the UN Global Compact. It outlined the investment case for considering environmental, social and governance factors, arguing that these issues posed risks and opportunities that impact financial performance. The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment, launched in 2006, further advocated incorporating ESG into investment analysis.
ESG gained further momentum in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis as investors realised risks were not being adequately captured by traditional financial metrics alone. ESG provided a framework to evaluate stakeholder impacts, ethical behaviour and enterprise risks more broadly.
What is an ESG checklist?
An ESG checklist is a list of key environmental, social and governance factors that investors, companies or advisors can use to objectively evaluate, benchmark and report on a company's responsible business practices, impacts and ethical standing.
Checklists help standardise measurement and reporting on ESG performance. Sample criteria may include greenhouse gas emissions, renewable energy use, waste management, water conservation, employee relations, diversity and inclusion, human rights, consumer privacy, executive pay equity, anti-corruption practices, board independence and shareholder rights.
The checklist allows assessing both compliance with norms and comparison between organisations.
What is the difference between ESG and sustainability?
Sustainability specifically focuses on environmental impacts and resource usage like emissions, energy, water, waste and conservation. It aims to ensure companies durably balance ecological and economic needs. ESG encompasses sustainability along with additional factors like workplace relations, human rights, consumer welfare, ethics and governance. So while sustainability lives within the “E” of ESG, ESG provides a more holistic framework for evaluating how responsibly and ethically a company operates overall. However, sustainability and ESG are complementary concepts that both prioritise long-term value to all stakeholders.
Why is ESG controversial?
Some argue that ESG factors politicise investing rather than focusing strictly on financial returns. They contend ESG metrics are subjective, not material to valuations and beholden to special interests. Critics also argue that pursing social or environmental goals falls outside the scope of a corporation's duty to shareholders.
However, proponents counter that ESG helps identify risks, future-proof against disruption, attract talent and protect reputation, which ultimately benefits shareholders. They argue that corporate social responsibility leads to sustainable long-term value creation.
Additional Resources
Climate Risk Governance – The Role of the Board
Decoding the Ethical Framework
Integrating ESG into Not-for-Profits: Managing Risks and Opportunities
Recommended Reading
Recommended Viewing
Author
- About
-
Better Boards connects the leaders of Australasian non-profit organisations to the knowledge and networks necessary to grow and develop their leadership skills and build a strong governance framework for their organisation.
Found this article useful or informative?
Join 5,000+ not-for-profit & for-purpose directors receiving the latest insights on governance and leadership.
Receive a free e-book on improving your board decisions when you subscribe.
Unsubscribe anytime. We care about your privacy - read our Privacy Policy .